Skip to main content

Psychic sophistry


Anonymous asked how to respond to someone who is very much into psychics like the U.S. Doreen Virtue. Should we humour them?

Probably depends on the individual. By far the best person to talk to is Tony Youens, who has a website here.

I actually asked Tony to write a piece for THINK on psychics, which you can read here. Hope it helps.

I also recommend you get your friend to read this.

When we launched THINK at Borders Bookstore in London, I advertized the event as involving philosophical discussion of psychic stuff and presented Tony as a genuine psychic. He did some nice stuff - spoon bending, telepathy, etc. and some audience members were taken in. At the end, we revealed the truth, and some people got very upset. In fact one insisted Tony really was psychic - he just didn't realize it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi Stephen,

Many thanks for the links, I'll check them out. Unfortunately Doreen Virtue goes way beyond the psychic stuff. She literally believes in angels, fairies, elementals, atlantis, alien abduction, crystal power (which ultimately led to the destruction of atlantis by the way) and many other such things. I am left in a kind of twilight zone where nothing is too absurd to be believed. How do you debate what is rational at all with someone who is willing to take such ideas seriously?
Strange though it may seem in light of this, the individual in question can be quite logical, reasonable and questioning but just not in this area. Spirituality I suppose might be the blanket term.

I must admit that I find myself a little shaken by the level of fantasy to which people are capable of subscribing. There really doesn't seem to be anything too ridiculous. Doreen et al often make reference to what they call the 'spiritual renaissance'. There does seem to be an alarming increase in this kind of thinking. I have seen 'angel shops' and other such stores selling new-age paraphernalia popping up. It seems so surreal at this point, I'm sure you could open a shop that literally sells 'snake oil' and do a roaring trade. All you need is an apparent expert to use words like 'harmonics', 'energy', 'clensing' and 'healing' in describing it.

While the evidence is far from conclusive, this sort of thing, the upsurge in fundamentalist religion, political tendancies towards 'old fashioned values' which inevitably contain some religious leanings, is there a general tendancy away from rationality brewing?
anticant said…
She sounds like a Muslim. There are billions of them.

Rational argument isn't on any of these folks' agendas. It's far too dull and boring.
pacificblue said…
Hi Mr Stephen,

i am a student from Singapore and i have just read your book entitled "the philosophy gym".

I found it to be a brilliant piece of writing especially in your ability to present many different sophisticated philosophical arguments in a clear and succinct manner . Your argument regarding homosexuality was particularly interesting and i must admit , it even corrected my initial prejudices regarding the issue many thanks!
Stephen Law said…
Many thanks, Daniel.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist